Egalitarianism Is Delusional

Egalitarianism [egal·i·tar·i·an·ism] (noun)

a social philosophy advocating the removal of inequalities among people  

Everyone in this nation wants to have same privileges. Everyone deserves an equal voice to speak their thoughts. However, everyone who was born or had travelled to this glorious dystopia was given a set of unequal prerogatives. Since America's very beginnings, its founding fathers demanded "certain unalienable rights" in its declaration of independence. I would like to point out that these may not be so 'inalienable' given the fact that these rights were stripped of you when you decided to colonize on the east coast of North America that--if I may state--was the homeland of the Iroquois, which if you haven't picked up yet, is extremely hypocritical given the fact that you had stripped them of their inalienable right; but I guess that the Iroquois were also at fault because technically they did migrate to North America from Siberia ( or so the historians say) at which at that point in time, America belonged to the freaking animals, like seriously, the Iroquois stole the land from the Buffaloes. They stripped the Buffaloes of their inalienable rights.

Anyways, fast forward to mid 1800s where a absconded slave, a black one at that, gives a speech filled with ridiculous questions regarding if a slave is "entitled to liberty" or "the rightful owner of his own body." I mean really Frederick? Is a slave entitled to liberty? Of course not. The rich white property owner paid a large sum of money for an investment like it. And it can't own its body because the white property owner paid for it.
I bought it.
Let me ask this Douglass, if I owned a twelve gold Coins, and they all tried to run away and I caught eight of them and four of them ran up north as fast as their tin gold foil legs would take them, wouldn't I be left with only eight Coins to work for me? Does it not seem reasonable that I beat the living excrement out of the eight coins until the four runaway Coins return to me? Coins clearly do not deserve freedom because they're property, Frederick. I, the rich white male property owner, own them; it's in my job title.

Oh and Mrs. Stanton, just because you write "woman" and a feminine pronoun to every other line of a cheap knockoff of the declaration of independence doesn't really give you any more validity to your 'entitlement' to equal rights as men. Just because you think you may have a eight-hour day job, take care of the newborn baby, cook the family meals, drive the three other children to their separate extracurricular activies, clean the house daily while staying perfectly sane and loving, doesn't mean you deserve the same rights as the husband. I work eight hours a day, get home, help the kids with homework, and take the family bills and put them in the file cabinet for next March to take care of. Do you realize how much value I bring to this family? I'm the bigger half of this household, heck I was the bigger half in making my kids.

If none of that articulate and pellucid monologue made absolutely no sense to a mere mortal such as yourself, let's go back to second grade.

To conclude/summarize/finish, either no one deserves equality or everyone deserves equality, including the Buffaloes and Coins. However, that will never be the case as Coins will always be property and Buffaloes have been stripped of their inalienable rights. Therefore, for those of you who propagate egalitarianism are absolute fools and outcasts as you most likely belong to a minority group. You minorities are deluding yourself, take a look at the past, as history repeats itself; equality has not happened in the past, and it won't be happening anytime soon.


Signed,
The skewed perspective of an average white property owning male


P. S.

Just like to say that if anyone is given unequal rights its got to be white male property owners.
We've got it bad.
 Everyone seems to hate on us, saying we hate every other minority group.








P. P. S.

Like seriously though.



































P. P. P. S.

I'm not crazy you fool.

I just have a distinct set of beliefs which I hold that you may not agree with (or anyone else in the world but I really don't care)

Ambiguous Morality

Date: August 5, 1963

South Vietnamese Marine attempts to alleviate the pain of one
of his own in a sugar cane field outside Saigon. His eyes are filled
with a strange emptiness, he does not seem to feel any pain or
loss-if anything he looks at the camera as if he were a child,
confused, unable to understand the purpose of bloodshed and war.

Date: August 1962

U.S. navy troop carrier takes South Vietnamese government troops to the Privincial Capital of Ca Mau. One soldier sits on guard as the rest of the battalion rest peacefully, appearing to be lifeless. The soldier on guard seems to be wary of his surroundings. He seems to be contemplating a deep matter, possibly the purpose of the war. His eyes are filled with a strange sort of resentment that seems to be directed at no particular person or group, but rather directed at the intangible war itself.

Date: (unknown)

Blindfolded Vietnamese citizen squats in dirt as two soldiers stand behind in watch. This appears to be some sort of execution of sport as the blindfolded man wears nothing but a a ragged shirt, smudged shorts and a face of indescribable fear. Details are unknown if the soldiers in the background are North Vietnamese, South Vietnamese or U.S. marines. Regardless, this image is a clear display of ambiguous morality as for viewers of the photo it seems cruel
but for the soldiers completing the task, it is just a part of their daily routine.

Date: June 8, 1972

After an aerial napalm attack on suspected Viet Cong hiding grounds, children, horrified are followed by South Vietnamese forces down Route 1 near Trang Bang. The soldiers in the backdrop are unnaturally calm, as the one on the far right seems to be having a cigarette. This contrast between the terrified children and emotionless soldiers forces viewers to question their beliefs on the Vietnam War. Was the United States' interference during a civil war of South Vietnam and North Vietnam truly righteous?